Fan of Fear2

Hacking the blog
I was just thinking about my blog journal and to my amazement "fan of fear" was posted. That article wasnt suppose to be published until 20117 it said. So why or how did it get published before then? Is the website compromised if so by whom. Could it be that my blog was compromised by "messengers of fear"? Maybe they feel obligated to compromise the blog.

   People like manipulating things they hate or find a easy target. Is lynnaments a easy target to sabotage? Did someone read the article and wanted it posted sooner or was just a way to showcase their hacking skills.  When I started lynnaments 3 yrs ago I anticipated people hacking my site and hacking at me therefore it's not surprising. I can only hope this blog sheds a small light of my dealings after lynnaluvers. A light that ask the question why is the blogger being targeted better yet why is the god anchor being blamed for people  targeting me.

  Why would they who target me feel obligated to target my blog and publish something I wasn't ready to publish. It's like Adele making a record and someone publishes her work without forewarning. I'm not comparing my blog to Adele's work but maybe the hometown of fear is the internet and I'm just visiting. Maybe those who felt obligated to publish fan of fear were residents of the hometown of fear and maybe me writing about politics and the god anchor is an insult. Yes, I can vouch for when fear is insulted it does publish. Publish insults to Assaults fear is a force that can drive a entire nation to be delusional let alone a blogger. Therefore the question shouldn't be who compromised my blog but who have I scared unintentionally with my writings; maybe the Government?

GODS CULTURE

Fathers Day is coming up and also the great ones Birthday. Now I have a article about how questionable Black American Culture/Fathers are versus Asian American Culture and Hispanic Culture/Fathers and how this could have crippled the god anchor.  I also Have an article that celebrates the anchor and her birth the acknowledgement of her persuasiveness and of her god being. Now some would say why don't I post both because both are interesting. The question is which one fits best with Lynnaments? Which on has the spirit lynnamentals?Which one has the DNA of a Conspiratorial article?

  Is  The fathers culture article more of a Lynnaments article. Does it have the make up of a mental,delusional Lynna Lai fan? What is it's focus? The focus of the three fathers article is more of  a look at how bad American black culture is and how that possibly created the situation She is in. It's almost suggesting that if the culture  of America was more East Asian American or Hispanic American Maybe the Anchor wouldn't have been fired in the first place from 19 and maybe I wouldn't have been ostracized. Lastly maybe deadbeat father wouldn't be a title that's associated with most blacks along with the blogger. Is that the DNA of a Lynnamentals article or is it more anti-black or anti-lynnamentals blogger. In the past when I used to write lynnaluvers.com I would sometimes assume that writing anti-black articles or anti-lynna luvers articles would be the same as writing pro Lynna Lai articles because in demeaning myself or who I am it would show how better the anchor is or how better her race is for the future of the tv media. I always argued that the way they promoted Obama as the "FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT". Is the same as what I'm doing. For example the article I wrote about how blacks are a huge part of the TV audience and how that isn't  necessarily a good thing (I believe that now even more).

  The mentality of Lynnamentals shows it's lack of interest in it's self therefore creating a delusional blog that grows into an interest of who god is or what the god anchor has done or how the god anchor might have a hand in what ever is going on . With that said "three fathers" culture  doesn't demonstrate it's self as a lynnamental interest or focused on god. It might show an interest of her culture or the culture I assume she's practicing or trying to create. It might even be delusional but it's in a state of delusion that's focused more on how awful the blogger and his culture is than how theirs a conspiracy against my blog or how she's trying to conspire to create  a anti-father or anti black father movement.

GOD OF DELUSIONS?

So once again In birthday 2014 I call the persuasive one  god or goddess. In lynnaluvers.com I used to credit her as being a goddess (god) and or a superior being. I can hear some people say or my lynnaments conscious saying we're suppose to be focusing on the conspiracy of the anchor not how immortal she is or how superior she is. Someone would say that me crediting her as god is the reason I got ostracized in the beginning. Do I really want things to be worse than they are now? Can the blogger sacrifice any more? I know it was her birthday but does that give us the excuse to call her god? Is she god?


   I know we're suppose to spawn or evolve into lynnamentals and not go back to lynnaluvers.com but even a convict recognizes  and watches good cop movies. Even the devil bowed to God. This means a delusional blogger who writes how he was ostracized can recognize a god anchor. We already wrote about our death in lynnaluvers what could be after death or should the question be what's before death? I know we possibly got Lynna Lai fired from 19 because we suggested she was a superior anchor but she also went to WKYC A SUPERIOR STATION. (Especially superior to other cities)

    We could even say  or suggest that her anchoring produced our writings in the beginning. Just like a god she enhances our delusional realizations. If  what we write produces her being let go from 19 and her presence produced lynnaluvers.com hence my Ostracizing what will lynnaments produce? A sacrifice of great magnitude that people will never write about the anchor again? How much of lynnaments is part of the future death and birth of something brand new for the god anchor? I definitely don't want things to be worse but is life really about me obviously not it's about god hence my delusional writings I guess. Which should be understandable not hated right?

Quality of Life

  So today I was saying I need to write down what I was going to share with you  and behold as I said "I need a pen " I look to my right and there it was just waiting for me to pick it up. I knew it was for me because it was in my favorite color. Which brings me to the subject of " Quality of Life ". Has my quality of life increased since the landlords take over and has the greatest anchor quality of life increased  since the exodus?

  In the dictionary that I  looked up online it says the QOL has to do with someones satisfaction or dissatisfaction. In the wiki it says that the QOL stands for someones well being. Someones mental,cultural,social,financial well being. My own definition has to do with fulfillment. Are you looking for something else after watching Lynna Lai? This had me thinking, from all of the Anchors antics during her time at WKYC  and WOIO from the past years  my absence in the state  would or should  make for a better life for her. Even if it helped her to increase her social life, the the quality of it all should at least jumped to 5%. Isn't that what we as fans wanted the great  news presenter to be elated because we believe it shows when she's anchoring.
 

   Some would say what about you and your own family? I have a feeling that my lack of quality creates more quality for the anchor . Which is why it makes sense to move, not just because Ohio has become open season for the superiors of the city but becasue if my displacement creates a better quality of life for the anchor my moving out of state would be even better.Theres a whole combination of reasons why I had to leave but it wouldn't of helped the impeccable news anchor if I stayed. Since when did I care about the news anchor I can hear someone say or think if I really cared about Lynna Lais success I wouldn't have made lynnaluvers or lynnaments. First,  I have a feeling that Lynna's going to be successful no matter what I do. Second I always wanted Lynna to get more air time even from the beginning of lynnaluvers.com if you can remember. Last but not least I don't think It's me wanting the great one to succeed its actually wanting the nay sayers to lose. Those that sabotaged her career or lied to make it seem like im the reason that she's only on during the  weekends.
 
  This isn't something to be discouraged about because as we look through out history did history makers have a quality life? Did the soldiers that died so that we can blog have a quality life? If history makers didn't have a quality life who am I to say that I should. What about my kid doesn't he deserve a quality life? Yes, but he deserves to live too. Meaning if they have a bounty out on me how much will they use my Son to destroy me or worse kill my kid because I tell him about how the media is medicine or how when he grows up there might be a Lady or ladies that might have vendetta against him because of me. How much of myself or my failure would hurt what the media and the great one is trying to instill in him and is it so important that they are willing to have me killed for it or worse put me away just so they can make an example out of me for my kid. He deserved not to be in a broken home, he deserved not to go to a public school but who stopped the traffic of life for all of that?

  Did we consider anyone else's kids quality of life when we wrote lynnaluvers.com No we didn't  and if we did we came to the conclusion that wouldn't take away anything from anyone else's kids. This brings me to the conclusion today that maybe the equalizer is working , the reason I say this is because maybe lynnaluvers.com destroyed homes and lives  and therefore Lynna Lai and compny had to destroy mine.